Ramblings from the digital universe…
  • Home
  • About
  • BIO
  • Contact
  • BANV – OpenFlow and SDN Tech Ta...

    Join the Bay Area Network Virtualization Group on April 30, 2013 for our OpenFlow and SDN Tech Talk and Hands-on Tutorial. For this event we will be hosting Srini Seetharaman [...]

    Read more
  • Ben Pfaff on OVS – Past, Presen...

    On March 20, 2013 the Bay Area Network Virtualization group hosted Ben Pfaff, the lead developer of the Open Virtual Switch (OVS). Ben gave a great presentation on the histor [...]

    Read more
  • Check out BANV
    NVIRTERS Meetup

    Software-Defined Networking (SDN) is the HOT topic in the IT industry. There’s a new meetup group dedicated to the topic of SDN and Network Virtualization. Nicknamed &# [...]

    Read more
  • Myspace – from the ashes?
    From the ashes

    They may get it right this time… I’ve been hard on Myspace – very hard. I don’t think my criticism at the time was unwarranted. Myspace had done just [...]

    Read more
  • The Business Value of SDN
    The Business Value of SDN

    Cloud computing is driving technology innovation at an ever-accelerating pace. We often get caught up in the technical aspects of new innovations and capabilities, and someti [...]

    Read more
  • Software-Defined Networking Presentat...

    Here’s the presentation I recently gave at the IEEE Smart Tech: Metro Area Workshop and the IEEE Consultants’ Network of Silicon Valley. Software-Defined Netw [...]

    Read more
  • IEEE Smart Tech: Metro Area Workshop
    IEEE Smart Tech: Metro Area Workshop

    Join me on September 29, 2012 at the IEEE Smart Tech: Metro Area Workshop in Santa Clara, CA. I will be speaking on the rapidly evolving Software-Defined Networking (SDN) mar [...]

    Read more
  • Another view of the cloud…

    I’m doing a series on cloud computing over at SAP on the Cloud. Now that cloud computing has finally passed the hype stage (for the most part), it’s time to start [...]

    Read more
  • Network Virtualization is Getting Int...
    Network Virtualization is Getting Interesting

    Remember server virtualization? You know, that technology that was the buzz of the technology world just a few short years ago. The one that got supplanted by the “clou [...]

    Read more
  • Are we still at the dawn of the age o...
    Are we still at the dawn of the age of cloud computing?

    It’s been an interesting week, culminated by a request from a colleague, Dr. John Levy. John asked me if I would substitute teach one of his lectures for the Fromm Inst [...]

    Read more

Posts tagged policy

‘Social Sentry’ is not the right answer…

Apr6th
2010
1 Comment Written by Robert

Social networking and the use of these tools that enable it (Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin, YouTube, et al) have been a frequent topic of posts and white papers by me on this site and over at SummaLogic. If you’ve read any of my thoughts on this subject you will see that (1) I am an advocate of this new model of social interaction; (2) I believe that employers should encourage and enable their employees to use the same tool as their customers, suppliers and partners; (3) social networking, just like any other corporate tool or resource needs to be managed; (4) employees must be aware of the risks and possible actions associated with brand damage from improper use of social networking tools; (5) the way to mitigate this problem is through active participation by employees in the development of a meaningful social networking policy.

I recently was asked about a new service from Teneros called “Social Sentry”. Basically, what this software as a service (SaaS) offering does is monitor your employees’ social networking activity. Not just their activity related to conducting your company’s business – but ALL their social networking activity. To me, this steps outside the bounds of enforcing corporate policy.

I’m the first to highlight the importance of brand protection, so I don’t think monitoring for situations that put your brand at risk is out of the question. But to do it on an employee by employee basis by injecting sniffing technology into their personal communications seems way too intrusive on their rights to personal privacy. Granted, I believe that by voluntarily engaging in social networking (or just using the internet in general) you by default give up most of your rights to privacy in the digital age – but for someone, especially my employer, to probe my personal communications seems a bit too much.

It’s hard to tell from the Social Sentry literature how the service actually detects brand risk situations. However, it does go so far as to say that it monitors communications from different devices (e.g., mobile) and detects “aliases” of personal identifiers. If Social Sentry is simply scanning for keywords related to a company’s brand and then highlighting those communications, well… maybe that’s not too bad. But the question is, how much information is Social Sentry saving about me? All my communications? Hmmm… That’s what it seems like from their literature. And what really surprised me is that Social Sentry even monitors my job search activities. Wow… employees beware…

Social networking is the elephant in the room. It’s here, you can’t move around without bumping into it, and it has the potential to mess up your living room. But tracking its every move seems to be a pretty extreme approach. Why not try showing it how to behave in the room – and then give it some trust?

 

Business, Technology    social networking

White Paper – Developing an Enterprise Social Networking Policy

Mar25th
2010
Leave a Comment Written by Robert

Do you have a social networking policy in place at your company? If not, read my latest white paper – Developing an Enterprise Social Networking Policy – at SummaLogic.com Learn tips and techniques for developing a meaningful policy that your employees will embrace and help protect your brand – and theirs!

Business    brand, social networking

Facebook eats its own dog food!

Feb27th
2009
Leave a Comment Written by Robert Keahey

I recently wrote a post about Facebook’s stumble with respect to publishing a new policy without first giving its user (customer) base a chance to review and provide feedback. Facebook quickly retracted the new policy as a result of the firestorm that was created by an outraged user community.  Just yesterday Facebook announced that it is now inviting its 175M members to participate in the development of its new user/customer “bill of rights”.  Interesting move – the world’s largest social networking provider using social networking to define its business policies and practices.  But a good move!

I am anxious to see how many Facebook members participate in the process. There were already 136,000 members participating in the “People Against the New Terms of Service” Facebook group. Facebook could easily be overwhelmed by the groundswell. What would really be interesting to me would be to compare the number of people who might have participated in the bill of rights development if Facebook had done this before it decided to change its policy. I venture to say it probably would have been less than the number who will participate now simply based on the fact that Facebook “infringed” (whether actually or perceived) on their rights.  Just like I wrote a couple of months ago about being complacent with respect to quality, I believe we are the same way about our rights.  We don’t act until we are acted upon.

This one will be interesting to watch unfold.

Business    facebook

Way to go Facebook!

Feb19th
2009
1 Comment Written by Robert Keahey

Unless you have somehow been off the planet for awhile, you more than likely have seen the flap over the recent changes in the Facebook user policy (Bill of Rights and Responsibilities). I have two slightly differing views on this recent series of events.

First, it doesn’t surprise me that Facebook issued a new user policy. After all, they are “growing up” and now have hoards of lawyers to protect their interests. Nothing wrong with the latter. But how you go about it is critical when you have 175M “customers”. Don’t change the policy without notifying your existing customers and giving them the option to continue/discontinue the use of your service after they have had a chance to read the new policy. Especially when their “intellectual property” is involved. Welcome to the world of groundswell! Way to go Facebook…

Under threat of a complaint to the Federal Trade Commission from the Electronic Privacy Information Center, Facebook has done “somewhat” of an about face on their user policy. They still retain rights to the content you place on Facebook, but only for the term of the user agreement. When you terminate the service they no longer have rights to your content. Sounds like a semi-acceptable concession, but we will have to see how the user community reacts. Again, groundswell will tell the tale.  Way to go Facebook…

On the other hand, from a consumer perspective – wake up! Facebook is free. It’s not like you are paying Facebook to protect your content. And I find it unlikely that Facebook is going to spin off a new business based on content they maintain. Yep, there’s some good stuff out there, but I can’t imagine they would be foolish enough to try to make money off it. By virtue of the fact that you are placing your intellectual property on the internet you are running the risk of it being plagiarized. Every day millions of people cut and paste content. It’s a fact of life in the digital world. So if you’re serious about protecting your intellectual property, spin up your own website or blog and display all the legalese you feel necessary to ensure that your visitors know you are serious about protecting it.

As I see it, Facebook was probably just trying to protect themselves from those who might think they could get some money out of Facebook by claiming that they never gave them the rights to display their content.  Yes, that’s a stretch, but when you have that many customers I am sure there are a few out there trying to figure how to get into your pockets.

This one will be fun to follow!  Way to go Facebook!

Business    facebook

Featured Post

  • The Business Value of SDN

Recent Posts

  • BANV – OpenFlow and SDN Tech Talk and Hands-on Tutorial
  • Ben Pfaff on OVS – Past, Present, Future
  • Check out BANV
  • Myspace – from the ashes?
  • The Business Value of SDN
  • Software-Defined Networking Presentation
  • IEEE Smart Tech: Metro Area Workshop
  • Another view of the cloud…
  • Network Virtualization is Getting Interesting
  • Are we still at the dawn of the age of cloud computing?
  • The speed of light and other important stuff…
  • The power of groundswell and how it affects your brand
  • The ever changing economics of all that IT stuff…
  • Klout scores are still questionable…
  • Is cloud innovation and adoption really being stifled?

White Papers

  • Addressing the Issue of Infrastructure Sprawl
  • Key Considerations for Implementing ITIL in Your Enterprise
  • Ensuring Your "Social Networking" Strategy Doesn't Turn Into "Social Not Working"
  • The CFO's Guide to the Cloud
  • Developing an Enterprise Social Networking Policy

Tags

aggregation Apple applications architecture augmented reality Azul Systems book review brand CIO cloud cloud computing customer service data smog facebook Google governance groundswell IaaS Innovation iPad iPhone java JVM klout laws of disruption learning location based services marketing mobility myspace Net Neutrality network PaaS policy privacy SDN security sobees social media social networking software-defined networking standards technology venture capital virtualization

Archives

Categories

EvoLve theme by Theme4Press  •  Powered by WordPress Ramblings from the digital universe...

Back to Top